nach oben

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

Erschienen in:

01.12.2023 | REVIEW

Risk factors associated to incisional hernia in stoma site after stoma closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Isabella Van-Londoño, Danny Conde Monroy, Jorge Navarro-Alean, Juliana Hernández-Ferreira, Daniela Hernández-Álvarez, Susana Rojas-López, Violeta Avendaño-Morales

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

This study aims to identify which risk factors are associated with the appearance of an incisional hernia in a stoma site after its closure. This in the sake of identifying which patients would benefit from a preventative intervention and thus start implementing a cost-effective protocol for prophylactic mesh placement in high-risk patients.

Methods

A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting incidence, risk factors, and follow-up time for appearance of incisional hernia after stoma site closure were included. A fixed-effects and random effects models were used to calculate odds ratios’ estimates and standardized mean values with their respective grouped 95% confidence interval. This to evaluate the association between possible risk factors and the appearance of incisional hernia after stoma site closure.

Results

Seventeen studies totaling 2899 patients were included. Incidence proportion between included studies was of 16.76% (CI95% 12.82; 21.62). Out of the evaluated factors higher BMI (p = 0.0001), presence of parastomal hernia (p = 0.0023), colostomy (p = 0,001), and end stoma (p = 0.0405) were associated with the appearance of incisional hernia in stoma site after stoma closure, while malignant disease (p = 0.0084) and rectum anterior resection (p = 0.0011) were found to be protective factors.

Conclusions

Prophylactic mesh placement should be considered as an effective preventative intervention in high-risk patients (obese patients, patients with parastomal hernia, colostomy, and end stoma patients) with the goal of reducing incisional hernia rates in stoma site after closure while remaining cost-effective.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Wilson MZ (2022) We asked the experts: repair techniques as prevention: ostomy closure is an incisional hernia repair. World J Surg 46(8):1896–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06540-x

De Haes F, Bullen NL, Antoniou GA, Smart NJ, Antoniou SA (2020) Systematic review and meta-analysis of incisional hernia post-reversal of ileostomy. Hernia 24(1):9–21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01961-5

Bhangu A, Fletcher L, Kingdon S, Smith E, Nepogodiev D, Janjua U (2012) A clinical and radiological assessment of incisional hernias following closure of temporary stomas. Surgeon 10(6):321–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2012.01.001

Stabilini C, Garcia-Urena MA, Berrevoet F, Cuccurullo D, Capoccia Giovannini S, Dajko M et al (2022) An evidence map and synthesis review with meta-analysis on the risk of incisional hernia in colorectal surgery with standard closure. Hernia 26(2):411–36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02555-w

Peltrini R, Imperatore N, Altieri G, Castiglioni S, Di Nuzzo MM, Grimaldi L et al (2021) Prevention of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure with different reinforcing mesh types: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia (0123456789). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02393-w

Mohamedahmed AYY, Stonelake S, Zaman S, Hajibandeh S (2020) Closure of stoma site with or without prophylactic mesh reinforcement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 35(8):1477–1488CrossRefPubMed

Alli VV, Zhang J, Telem DA (2018) Impact of incisional hernia development following abdominal operations on total healthcare cost. Surg Endosc 32(5):2381–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5936-8

Sheikh Y, Asunramu H, Low H, Gakhar D, Muthukumar K, Yassin H et al (2022) A cost-utility analysis of mesh prophylaxis in the prevention of incisional hernias following stoma closure surgery. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(20).

Rhemtulla IA, Messa CA, Enriquez FA, Hope WW, Fischer JP (2018) Role of prophylactic mesh placement for laparotomy and stoma creation. Surg Clin North Am 98(3):471–481CrossRefPubMed

10.

Smith L, Meggy A, Watts T, Knight L, Torkington J, Cornish J (2022) Incisional hernia prevention: risk-benefit from a patient perspective (INVITE) - protocol for a single-centre, mixed-methods, cross-sectional study aiming to determine if using prophylactic mesh in incisional hernia prevention is acceptable to patients. BMJ Open 12(12):e069568CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Lambrichts DPV, de Smet GHJ, van der Bogt RD, Kroese LF, Menon AG, Jeekel J et al (2018) Incidence, risk factors and prevention of stoma site incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis 20(10):O288-303CrossRef

12.

Harries RL, Torkington J (2018) Stomal closure: strategies to prevent incisional hernia. Front Surg 5(April):1–7

13.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, The PRISMA et al (2020) statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021:372

14.

Muka T, Glisic M, Milic J, Verhoog S, Bohlius J, Bramer W et al (2020) A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. Eur J Epidemiol 35(1):49–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5

15.

Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (Minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716CrossRefPubMed

16.

DerSimonian R, Laird N (2015) Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials 45:139–145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, Rücker G (2023) Meta-analysis with R. First. Springer Cham. pp 1–218

18.

Calvo Espino P, Sánchez Movilla A, Alonso Sebastian I, García Schiever J, Varillas Delgado D, Sánchez Turrión V et al (2022) Incidence and risk factors of delayed development for stoma site incisional hernia after ileostomy closure in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with temporary ileostomy. Acta Chir Belg 122(1):41–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2020.1846941

19.

Ramírez-Giraldo C, Torres-Cuellar A, Cala-Noriega C, Figueroa-Avendaño CE, Navarro-Alean J (2021) When to use a prophylactic mesh after stoma closure: a case–control study. Hernia (0123456789):9–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02508-3

20.

Bloomfield I, Dobson B, Von Papen M, Clark D (2022) Incisional hernia following ileostomy closure: who’s at risk? The Gold Coast experience. ANZ J Surg 92(1–2):146–150CrossRefPubMed

21.

Mongelard K, Mynster T, Jensen KK (2020) Stoma-site hernia after stoma reversal following rectal cancer resection. Dan Med J 67(3):1–5

22.

Eklöv K, Viktorsson FZ, Frosztega E, Bringman S, Nygren J, Everhov ÅH (2020) Hernia at the stoma site after loop ileostomy reversal. Int J Colorectal Dis 35(5):887–895CrossRefPubMed

23.

Kelly-Schuette K, Wilkes A, Kyriakakis R, Ogilvie J (2020) Predictors of hernia after loop ileostomy closure: a single-center retrospective review. Int J Colorectal Dis 35(9):1695–1702CrossRefPubMed

24.

De Robles MS, Bakhtiar A, Young CJ (2019) Obesity is a significant risk factor for ileostomy site incisional hernia following reversal. ANZ J Surg 89(4):399–402CrossRefPubMed

25.

Kaneko T, Funahashi K, Ushigome M, Kagami S, Goto M, Koda T et al (2019) Incidence of and risk factors for incisional hernia after closure of temporary ileostomy for colorectal malignancy. Hernia 23(4):743–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1855-4

26.

Brook AJ, Mansfield SD, Daniels IR, Smart NJ (2018) Incisional hernia following closure of loop ileostomy: the main predictor is the patient, not the surgeon. Surgeon 16(1):20–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2016.03.004

27.

Amelung FJ, de Guerre LEVM, Consten ECJ, Kist JW, Verheijen PM, Broeders IAMJ et al (2018) Incidence of and risk factors for stoma-site incisional herniation after reversal. BJS Open 2(3):128–134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Vergara-Fernández O, Trejo-Avila M, Salgado-Nesme N (2019) Multivariate analysis of risk factors for complications after loop ileostomy closure. Cir y Cir (English Ed.) 87(3):337–46.

29.

Oriel BS, Chen Q, Itani KMF (2017) Incidence, recurrence and risk factors of hernias following stoma reversal. Am J Surg 214(2):232–238CrossRefPubMed

30.

Fazekas B, Fazekas B, Hendricks J, Smart N, Arulampalam T (2017) The incidence of incisional hernias following ileostomy reversal in colorectal cancer patients treated with anterior resection. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 99(4):319–324CrossRefPubMed

31.

De Keersmaecker G, Beckers R, Heindryckx E, Kyle-Leinhase I, Pletinckx P, Claeys D et al (2016) Retrospective observational study on the incidence of incisional hernias after reversal of a temporary diverting ileostomy following rectal carcinoma resection with follow-up CT scans. Hernia 20(2):271–277CrossRefPubMed

32.

Sharp SP, Francis JK, Valerian BT, Canete JJ, Chismark AD, Lee EC (2015) Incidence of ostomy site incisional hernias after stoma closure. Am Surg 81(12):1244–1248CrossRefPubMed

33.

Cingi A, Solmaz A, Attaallah W, Aslan A, Aktan AO (2008) Enterostomy closure site hernias: a clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation. Hernia 12(4):401–405CrossRefPubMed

34.

Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A, Aktan AO (2006) Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49(10):1559–1563CrossRefPubMed

35.

Simons MP, Smietanski M, Bonjer HJ, Bittner R, Miserez M, Aufenacker TJ et al (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22(1):1–165CrossRef

36.

Henriksen NA, Bisgaard T, Helgstrand F (2020) Smoking and obesity are associated with increased readmission after elective repair of small primary ventral hernias: a nationwide database study. Surgery 168(3):527–31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2020.04.012

37.

Nachiappan S, Markar S, Karthikesaligam A, Ziprin P, Faiz O (2013) Prophylactic mesh placement in high-risk patients undergoing elective laparotomy: a systematic review. World J Surg 37(8):1861–1871CrossRefPubMed

38.

Fox SS, Johnson R, Fischer JP, Eckhauser F, Hope WW (2018) Prophylactic mesh for hernia prevention: Has the time arrived? Plast Reconstr Surg 142(3S):180S-186SCrossRefPubMed

39.

Lorenz A, Kogler P, Kafka-Ritsch R, Öfner D, Perathoner A (2019) Incisional hernia at the site of stoma reversal—incidence and risk factors in a retrospective observational analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 34(7):1179–1187CrossRefPubMed

40.

Barranquero AG, Tobaruela E, Bajawi M, Muñoz P, Die Trill J, Garcia-Perez JC (2020) Incidence and risk factors for incisional hernia after temporary loop ileostomy closure: choosing candidates for prophylactic mesh placement. Hernia 24(1):93–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02042-3

41.

Schreinemacher MHF, Vijgen GHEJ, Dagnelie PC, Bloemen J, Huizinga BF, Bouvy ND (2014) Incisional hernias in temporary stoma wounds. ARCH SURG 146(1):94–99CrossRef

42.

Fok CYJ, Fung TLD, Kwok KH (2021) Predictors of morbidity related to stoma closure after colorectal cancer surgery. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 406(2):349–356CrossRef

43.

Niu N, Du S, Yang D, Zhang L, Wu B, Zhi X et al (2022) Risk factors for the development of a parastomal hernia in patients with enterostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 37(3):507–519CrossRefPubMed

44.

Śmietański M, Szczepkowski M, Alexandre JA, Berger D, Bury K, Conze J et al (2014) European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias. Hernia 18(1):1–6CrossRefPubMed

45.

Bhangu A, Nepogodiev D, Futaba K (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure. World J Surg 36(5):973–983CrossRefPubMed

46.

Huang C, Ogawa R (2014) The link between hypertension and pathological scarring: Does hypertension cause or promote keloid and hypertrophic scar pathogenesis? Wound Repair Regen 22(4):462–466CrossRefPubMed

47.

van den Hil LCL, van Steensel S, Schreinemacher MHF, Bouvy ND (2019) Prophylactic mesh placement to avoid incisional hernias after stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 23(4):733–741CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Feldmann TF, Young MT, Pigazzi A (2014) Incisional reinforcement in high-risk patients. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 27(4):149–155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Bhangu A, Nepogodiev D, Ives N, Magill L, Glasbey J, Forde C et al (2020) Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 395(10222):417–426CrossRef

50.

Warren JA, Beffa LR, Carbonell AM, Cull J, Sinopoli B, Ewing JA et al (2018) Prophylactic placement of permanent synthetic mesh at the time of ostomy closure prevents formation of incisional hernias. Surg (United States) 163(4):839–46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.09.041

51.

Shaw RD, Goldwag JL, Wilson LR, Ivatury SJ, Tsapakos MJ, Pauli EM et al (2022) Retrorectus mesh reinforcement of ileostomy site fascial closure: stoma closure and reinforcement (SCAR) trial phase I/II results. Hernia 26(6):1645–1652CrossRefPubMed

52.

Maggiori L, Moszkowicz D, Zappa M, Mongin C, Panis Y (2015) Bioprosthetic mesh reinforcement during temporary stoma closure decreases the rate of incisional hernia: A blinded, case-matched study in 94 patients with rectal cancer. Surg (United States) 158(6):1651–1657

Titel: Risk factors associated to incisional hernia in stoma site after stoma closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von: Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo
Isabella Van-Londoño
Danny Conde Monroy
Jorge Navarro-Alean
Juliana Hernández-Ferreira
Daniela Hernández-Álvarez
Susana Rojas-López
Violeta Avendaño-Morales
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-023-04560-0

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Traumatologische Notfälle Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Internistische Arzneimitteltherapie Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Risk factors associated to incisional hernia in stoma site after stoma closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis