Case-reports/series and cohorts of Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) associated with COVID-19 vaccination have been reported.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of GBS after COVID-19 vaccination was carried out. Incidence and incidence rate ratio for a number of vaccine doses and risk of GBS, also considering the specific vaccine technology, were calculated in a random-effects model.
Results
Of 554 citations retrieved, 518 were discarded as irrelevant. We finally included 15 studies. The random effect model yielded, regardless of the vaccine technology, 1.25 (95%CI 0.21; 2.83) GBS cases per million of COVID-19 vaccine doses, 3.93 (2.54; 5.54) cases per million doses for adenovirus-vectored vaccines and 0.69 (0.38; 1.06) cases per million doses for mRNA vaccines. The GBS risk was 2.6 times increased with the first dose. Regardless of the vaccine technology, the GBS risk was not increased but disaggregating the data it was 2.37 (1.67; 3.36) times increased for adenovirus-vectored vaccines and 0.32 (0.23; 0.47) for mRNA vaccines. Mortality for GBS after vaccination was 0.10 per million doses and 4.6 per GBS cases.
Conclusions
Adenovirus-vectored vaccines showed a 2.4 times increased risk of GBS that was about seven times higher compared with mRNA-based vaccines. The decreased GBS risk associated with mRNA vaccines was possibly due to an elicited reduction of infections, including SARS-CoV-2, associated with GBS during the vaccination period. How adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines may trigger GBS is unclear and further studies should investigate the relationship between vaccine technologies and GBS risk.
Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS), a rare but potentially fatal disorder, is thought to be an autoimmune, post-infective polyradiculoneuropathy and is the most common cause of acute flaccid paralysis with an overall annual incidence of 1.1–1.8 cases per 100,000 [1, 2]. The GBS eponym is an umbrella term including a number of related autoimmune neuropathies including the GBS and Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) variants with their subtypes [3]. In about two-thirds of patients, a gastrointestinal or respiratory infection precedes, within six weeks, the onset of GBS [1]. GBS has been also possibly associated with several vaccines and an excess of GBS cases was detected in the United States during the 1976/1977 “swine flu” (H1N1) vaccination campaign [4]. Epidemiological analyses showed that the rate of GBS attributable to the vaccine was approximately 4.9–5.9 per million vaccinations and greater from 14 to 28 days post-vaccination, with a 7.3-fold increase in the risk of developing GBS [4, 5]. Since then, several studies have assessed the risk of GBS following influenza vaccines with only two studies suggesting approximately one additional GBS case per one million vaccinations [6, 7]. An increased risk of GBS (3 excess cases per million of doses) has been also reported following the administration of the recombinant zoster vaccine [8]. No other vaccines have been convincingly linked to GBS [9].
Several vaccines against COVID-19 pathology, including the adenovirus-vectored Vaxzevria and the mRNA vaccine Comirnaty, have been approved for use in many countries since December 2020 and have been shown to reduce SARS-CoV-2 infections, viral transmission, patient hospitalizations and deaths in randomized controlled trials and real-world effectiveness studies [10‐12]. However, the clinical trials were underpowered to detect rare adverse events such as GBS [11].
Anzeige
Soon after the start of large-scale vaccine programs, single cases and small series of GBS following vaccination with Vaxzevria were reported. In July 2021, both the FDA and the European Medicines Agency issued warnings of an increased GBS risk after adenovirus-vectored vaccines [13, 14]. In a UK-based cohort study, excess cases of GBS per one million people receiving Vaxzevria varied from 2.3 to 2.9 [15]. On May 2023 the WHO declared the end of the SARS-CoV-2 public health emergency of international with a total of 13.42 billion vaccine doses administered worldwide [16]. The aim of this meta-analysis is to reappraise, two years after the introduction of vaccines, the epidemiological data regarding the association between COVID-19 vaccination and GBS.
Methods and materials
Study design, search strategy and inclusion criteria
An author (SC) performed a systematic search on all studies published from 1 January 2020 to 19 April 2023 via PubMed-MEDLINE. The search terms used are reported in Fig. 1. All available peer-reviewed papers published in English, French, Italian, and Spanish were included. Letters, and commentaries that reported original data were also included. The reference lists of all relevant articles were also examined. No restriction on population gender, ethnicity, age, and medical history was applied. For missing or unclear information, we obtained further data consulting the original authors. List of included vaccines is available in the supplementary materials (SM) (Table S3). When more cohorts from the same area were present, we included the one with the more numerous population sample for each type of vaccine.
Fig. 1
Flowchart of studies selection and search terms used
×
The inclusion criteria were: COVID-19 vaccination; diagnosis of GBS, MFS and their subtypes according to a clinical classification [3]; occurrence of GBS within 42 days after vaccination [17]; hospitalized patients. Diagnostic criteria adopted in each included study are summarized in SM.
Quality assessment and publication bias
This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) in 2023 (CRD42023433398) and was conducted complying with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines [18]. Eligible cohort studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias through the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale [19].
Anzeige
Statistical analysis
All analyses were performed using Microsoft Office and R software version 4.1.0. Packages utilised are detailed in the Supplementary Material [20].
For the study of GBS incidence following vaccination we adopted both Freeman-Tukey Transformation (FTT) and General Linear Mixed Model (GLMM). Average effects for the outcomes and 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained using a random–effect model. We adopted both methods since conflicting opinions persist on which is the optimal method for meta-analysis of rare events [21]. We adopted the Mantel–Haenszel (MH) method in a random-effects model for calculating the Risk Ratio (RR) between observed and expected GBS cases after vaccination. Proportion of total variability due to between-study heterogeneity was estimated by Cochrane Q Chi2 statistics and I2 statistics [22]. Since our analysis dealt with rare events, we did not set a cut-off for homogeneity for Cochrane Q Chi2 test p-value and/or for I2 statistics. I2 represents what proportion of the observed variance is attributed to the variance in true effects rather than to sampling error. For a qualitative interpretation, I2 values lower than 30% were considered to represent low variability due to between-study heterogeneity, while values higher than 75% indicated considerably high variability [20]. The Knapp–Hartung adjustment was applied to the calculation of confidence intervals when more than five studies were available, while Paule–Mandel estimator was used to calculate tau2. Prediction intervals were based on t-distribution [22] and were calculated when more than six studies were available, acknowledging that the statistical accuracy of prediction intervals is inflated when dealing with rare events [23]. We built forest plots for each meta-analysis endpoint and then assessed for the presence of small-study effects and possible publication bias using Egger’s and Peters’ method for assessment of funnel plot asymmetry when more than 10 studies were available [24]. Wherever appropriate, we conducted an influence analysis and plotted the results. Outlier analysis was also implemented (studies with low standard error that still deviate substantially from the pooled effect are classified as outliers) [20].
For incidence analyses, we reported only the FTT outcomes in the main text; GLMM results and more detailed presentation of the meta-analyses is reported in "Methods and materials" section of in the supplementary information (SI).
Results
Figure 1 is the flowchart of the systematic review. A total of 554 references were identified, of which 518, after reviewing the title and the abstract, were discarded as not pertinent.
Of 36 potentially relevant papers, we excluded 21 papers for the following reasons: uncertainty whether GBS was related to COVID-19 disease or vaccination (n = 1), GBS not related to a vaccine (n = 2), not sufficient data (n = 2), missing data on total COVID-19 vaccine doses (n = 7), possible overlapping patients (n = 9).
Overall, 15 studies were included [25‐39]. The meta-analysis only deals with adeno-vectored and mRNA vaccines since very few data are available for other vaccine technologies.
GBS incidence per COVID-19 vaccine doses administered regardless of the vaccine technology
We included 17 cohorts from 13 studies, collecting 1450 GBS cases over a total of 1,058,927,070 administered vaccine doses. The random-effects model yielded 1.25 GBS cases per million vaccine doses (95%CI 0.21; 2.83) (Fig. 2). The prediction interval yielded a range of 0 to 9.6 cases per million vaccine doses. Regional subgroup analyses showed for Asian countries 1.53 GBS cases per million vaccine doses (95%CI 0.00; 11.08), and for European countries 1.81 GBS cases per million vaccine doses (95%CI 1.08; 2.71) (SI).
Fig. 2
Forest plot of GBS incidence with respect to COVID-19 vaccine doses administered regardless of the vaccine technology. Events: number of GBS cases; Total: number of vaccine doses
×
Risk ratio after first and second vaccination dose
We included five cohorts in the analysis of risk between GBS cases after the first and second doses of COVID-19 vaccination. We excluded vaccines that required only one vaccine dose (e.g., Jcovden). The MH method yielded an RR of 2.60 (95%CI 0.42, 15.92) for the first dose (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Forest plot about risk ratio between GBS cases linked to first and second doses of COVID-19 vaccine. Events: number of GBS cases; Total: number vaccine doses
×
Anzeige
GBS incidence per COVID-19 vaccine technology
For adenoviral-vectored vaccines, we included 11 cohorts from 7 studies, collecting 806 GBS cases over a total of 127,355,745 vaccine doses. The random-effect model yielded 3.93 (95%CI 2.54; 5.54) GBS cases per million doses of adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccine (Fig. 4A). More specifically, for Vaxzevria the random-effect model proportion was 2.23 GBS cases every million doses (95%CI 0.00, 7.88). For Jcovden the random-effect model proportion was 6.63 for every million doses (95%CI 4.75, 8.80) (SI, Section 2).
Fig. 4
Forest plot of GBS incidence with respect to A adenoviral-vectored COVID-19 vaccine doses administered, and B with respect to mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine doses administered. Events: number of GBS cases; Total: number of A adenoviral-vectored or B mRNA-based vaccine doses
×
For mRNA vaccines, we included 14 cohorts from 8 studies, collecting 534 GBS cases over a total of 823,793,743 vaccine doses. The random-effect model proportion yielded 0.69 (95%CI 0.38; 1.06) GBS cases per million doses of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine with a prediction interval from 0.00 to 2.18 (Fig. 4B).
Specifically, for Comirnaty the random-effect model proportion was 0.64 GBS cases every million doses (95%CI 0.12, 1.45), and for Spikevax the random-effect model proportion was 0.66 every million doses (95%CI 0.27, 1.21) with a prediction interval between 0.0 and 2.6 (SI, Section 2).
Risk ratio between observed and expected GBS cases after COVID-19 vaccination
We included 15 cohorts from 5 studies in the analysis of risk between observed and expected GBS cases after COVID-19 vaccination regardless of the vaccine employed. The quantification method for expected cases for each study is summarised in SI. We identified 1690 observed and 2190 expected GBS cases over a total of 706,234,418 vaccine doses. The MH method yielded an RR of 1.09 (95%CI 0.68; 0.90) (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5
Forest plots of risk ratio between observed and expected GBS linked to COVID-19 vaccine doses administered regardless the vaccine technology; B with respect to vector-based vaccines; C with respect to mRNA vaccines. For vaccinated, Events: number of GBS cases; Total: number of vaccine doses. For expected, Events: number of expected GBS cases; Total: number of subjects in the population considered. AdV: adenoviral-vectored vaccines
×
Anzeige
Regarding GBS after adenovirus-based vaccination, we included ten cohorts from 5 studies. The MH method yielded an RR of 2.37 (95%CI 1.67, 3.36) (Fig. 6A). For GBS after mRNA-based vaccination, we included nine cohorts. The MH method yielded an RR of 0.32 (95%CI 0.23, 0.47) (Fig. 6B).
Fig. 6
Forest plot about risk ratio between GBS cases linked to COVID-19 vaccine doses administered; A with respect to adenoviral-vectored vaccines; B with respect to mRNA vaccines. For vaccinated, Events: number of GBS cases; Total: number of vaccine doses. For expected, Events: number of expected GBS cases; Total: number of subjects in the population considered
×
GBS mortality per COVID-19 vaccine doses administered and among GBS cases
We included six cohort studies in the analysis of mortality among people who developed GBS after being vaccinated against COVID-19 regardless of the vaccine technology. We identified 28 deaths in 524 GBS cases for a total of 696,978,860 vaccine doses. The random-effect model proportion yielded 0.10 deaths with GBS per million doses of COVID-19 vaccine (95%CI 0.00; 0.75) (Fig. 7A). Considering the mortality among GBS the random-effect model proportion yielded 4.6 deaths for every 100 GBS cases after COVID-19 vaccination (95%CI 1.23, 5.45) (Fig. 7B).
Fig. 7
Forest plots of GBS mortality after COVID-19 vaccination. A with respect to administered doses; B with respect to GBS cases after vaccination. Events: number of deaths; Total: number of total COVID-19 vaccine doses (A) and GBS cases (B)
×
Assessment of study quality, publication bias, heterogeneity, and sensitivity analyses
The overall quality of the included studies was deemed high (SI, Table S2). Assessment of funnel plot asymmetry with visual inspection and Egger’s and Peter’s test showed potential asymmetry for the following analyses: all vaccine technologies and adenoviral-vectored incidence, risk ratio between observed and expected for all vaccine technologies. Both FTT and GLMM methods showed similar results, with GLMM giving greater asymmetry in funnel plots and slightly wider prediction intervals (SI, Section 2). Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed for some analyses (SI, Section 2). No single study significantly affected the computed effect size for each outcome, as shown by influence analysis and outlier remotion (SI, Section 2). Baujat plots were also produced when feasible to elucidate the contribution of a single study to the overall random-effect model heterogeneity (SI, Section 2).
Discussion
This meta-analysis showed, regardless of the vaccine technology, a rate of 1.25 GBS cases per million of COVID-19 vaccine doses. However, the GBS rate for adenovirus-vectored vaccines was five times higher than for mRNA vaccines.
Anzeige
Overall COVID-19 vaccination was not associated with an increased risk of GBS but, disaggregating the data, the GBS risk with adenovirus-vectored vaccines (regardless of whether the vector was simian or human) was 2.4 times increased and about seven times higher compared with mRNA vaccines.
The increased GBS risk with adenovirus-vectored vaccines is not easily explainable. An antecedent adenovirus infection was found to be not more frequent in GBS cases than in controls [40]. Adenoviruses, commonly used to deliver vaccination antigens to the host, are thought to be safe and only a single observational study suggested a link between adenovirus oral vaccination and GBS in a military population [41]. However, 10 out of the 12 GBS-reported cases had also a preceding upper respiratory infection, as a possible GBS trigger, and received multiple vaccines making the association unlikely. Adenovirus-vectored vaccines contain the SARS-CoV-2 gene to codify the spike protein, but the reduced GBS risk associated with mRNA vaccines, which also codify the spike protein, makes unlikely that the spike protein is the causative factor for the increased GBS risk. A non-specific immune activation in susceptible individuals can be hypothesized but, if this is the case, it should occur with all adenovirus-vectored vaccines.
Regarding the reduced GBS risk with the mRNA vaccines, it should be underlined that the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was characterized by unique and drastic public health measures that, by reducing the circulation of infective agents known to trigger GBS, likely decreased the background risk of GBS. Indeed, most respiratory and common gastrointestinal infections, including C. jejuni, decreased significantly in incidence during the pandemic [42, 43]. On the other hand, SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated in some countries with a higher GBS risk during the early pandemic period and in European cohorts, during the first pandemic wave, the pooled rate of GBS with SARS-CoV-2 infection was 61.3% of the total [44, 45]. A recent study from Israel confirms that GBS risk after Comirnaty vaccine was about 15 times reduced compared with the risk after SARS-CoV-2 infection [46]. These observations suggest that the reduced GBS risk associated with mRNA vaccines represents probably the background GBS risk due to the combined effect of health measures and vaccination.
Our meta-analysis shows that the occurrence of GBS is more than twice as frequent after the first vaccine dose compared to the second one, confirming previous findings [39]. This may be explained by an individual susceptibility triggering GBS with the very first dose and because patients experiencing serious adverse effects from the first dose might have preferred not to undergo the second one. Interestingly, only one patient experiencing GBS after both the first and the second dose of Vaxzevria was reported in the UK [39]. The mortality rate in GBS after COVID-19 vaccination is about 5%, which is in line with the previously reported range (3–10%) [1].
Conclusions
This meta-analysis confirms an increased, although overall low, risk of GBS following adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines. The incidence of GBS cases per million vaccinations is lower than the estimated incidence for the 1976/1977 “swine flu” vaccination but is higher than for the modern influenza vaccine. mRNA vaccines were associated with decreased GBS risk, possibly because of a reduction in infections, including SARS-CoV-2, that may be associated with GBS during the vaccination period. Overall, the established epidemiological benefits of COVID-19 vaccination in reducing viral transmission, hospitalization, and deaths, greatly overtake, in our opinion, the risk of developing GBS even after adenovirus-vectored vaccines. How adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines may trigger GBS is unclear and further studies should investigate the relationship between vaccine technologies and GBS to optimise patients’ safety.
Declaration
Conflicts of interest
None.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Mit e.Med Neurologie & Psychiatrie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der dazugehörigen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
Mit e.Med Neurologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes, den Premium-Inhalten der neurologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Neurologie-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
Ein hohes soziales Niveau ist mit die beste Versicherung gegen eine Demenz. Noch geringer ist das Demenzrisiko für Menschen, die sozial aufsteigen: Sie gewinnen fast zwei demenzfreie Lebensjahre. Umgekehrt steigt die Demenzgefahr beim sozialen Abstieg.
Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.
Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.
Auch ein sehr ausgedehnter ischämischer Schlaganfall scheint an sich kein Grund zu sein, von einer mechanischen Thrombektomie abzusehen. Dafür spricht die LASTE-Studie, an der Patienten und Patientinnen mit einem ASPECTS von maximal 5 beteiligt waren.
Update Neurologie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletterund bleiben Sie gut informiert.
