Background
Mitochondria are dynamic organelles that undergo constant fusion and fission, both of which are mediated by nuclear DNA (nDNA)-encoded proteins that act on the mitochondrial membrane [
1]. A proper dynamic balance between mitochondrial fission and fusion is essential to maintain the morphology of the mitochondrial network and function. Defects in mitochondrial proteins can lead to abnormal fusion and fission, resulting in clinical disease [
2]. In mammals, DRP1, a protein encoded by the
DNM1L gene, is a core component of the mitochondrial fission process and contains an N-terminal GTPase domain, a middle domain, a non-conserved variable domain (VD), and a C-terminal GTPase effector domain (GED) [
3‐
5]. The major functional units are the GTPase domain, which provides the mechanical force for membrane contraction, and the middle domain, which mediates DRP1 oligomerization [
6]. In addition, DRP1 is also involved in mediating peroxisomal fission [
7].
DRP1 impairment causes two neurological diseases associated with pathogenic variants in
DNM1L (MIM*603,850), including encephalopathy due to defective mitochondrial and peroxisomal fission-1 (EMPF1, MIM #614,388) and optic atrophy 5 (MIM#610,708). EMPF1, caused by monoallelic or biallelic pathogenic
DNM1L variants, is frequently associated with developmental delay, hypotonia, refractory epilepsy, and even death [
8‐
10]. The first reported
de novo heterozygous
DNM1L variant, c.1184C>A, p.Ala395Asp, caused a disease phenotype manifested by global developmental delay, neonatal encephalopathy, microcephaly, and optic atrophy [
10]. The patient died suddenly at 37 days of age with minimal developmental progress. It has been reported that the p.Ala395Asp variant is located in the middle domain of DRP1 and impairs higher order assembly and GTPase activity of DRP1, resulting in abnormal mitochondrial and peroxisomal fission [
11]. Recently, an increasing number of heterozygous variants in the DRP1 middle domain have been reported to cause severe encephalopathy with epilepsy and/or failure to thrive [
12‐
14]. In contrast, heterozygous variants in the GTPase domain appear to be associated with a milder phenotype limited to isolated optic atrophy [
15]. To our knowledge, disease-causing variants in the GED have rarely been reported in humans.
Here, we describe a 5-year-old girl with a novel c.2161C>T, p.Gln721Ter DNM1L variant identified in the GED. She had a different clinical presentation compared to previously reported cases, expanding the clinical presentation of DNM1L-related mitochondrial disease. Furthermore, due to the lack of studies on the phenotype-genotype correlation of DNM1L-related diseases, a review of the literature summarizing the relevance of clinical and genetic features may deepen the understanding of the disease.
Review of the literature
Based on the differences in phenotypes observed in the patients studied, all reported cases of
DNM1L variants were reviewed (Supplementary Table
2) [
5,
8‐
10,
12‐
15,
18‐
40]. A total of 53 cases were analyzed together with our case. In the described cases, the median age at which patients initially presented with clinical manifestations of specific organs or systems due to
DNM1L variants was 12 months (range, neonatal period to 13 years). 40.0% of the cases eventually died (range, 8 days to 20 years), with a minimum age of death of 8 days and an average age of death of 5.7 years.
The phenotypic spectrum of
DNM1L variants included neurological, craniofacial, cardiac, and ocular features. Neurological manifestations such as developmental delay/regression, hypotonia, ataxia, peripheral neuropathy, and epilepsy were the main characteristic features of patients with EMPF1. Of the 50 reported cases (except for pedigrees 1, 2, and 14), clinical manifestations included developmental delay/regression (DD and DR) in 74.0% (37/50), epilepsy (GTCS, SRSE, RSE, and FSE) in 68.0% (34/50), and dystonia in 32.0% (16/50). Other symptoms included 9 cases of peripheral neuropathy, 9 cases of microcephaly, 9 cases of encephalopathy, 8 cases of ataxia, 6 cases of pain insensitivity, 6 cases of dysarthria, and 5 cases of strabismus (Table
2). Regarding the auxiliary examinations, 68.0% (34/50) of the cases showed abnormal brain MRI and 44.0% (22/50) of the cases showed abnormal EEG. In addition, 42.0% (21/50) of the cases had elevated lactate.
To date, 33 pathogenic and/or potentially pathogenic variants have been reported in patients.
De novo variants were identified in 79.2% (42/53) of the cases, and homozygous variants were identified in only 3.8% (2/53) of cases [
5,
9]. As shown in Fig.
2b, more than half of the variants were located in the middle domain of the DRP1 protein, and 67.6% (23/34) of the middle domain variants occurred mainly in exon 11, confirming that exon 11 was the hotspot of variants in the whole
DNM1L gene.
Table 2
Summary of key clinical features in patients with DNM1L variants in different domains
Age of onset (year) | 0.25 (0–6) | 2.4 (0–13) | 1.5 (0.25–3) | |
Sex | | | | |
Male | 46.2% (6/13) | 52.9% (18/34) | 33.3% (1/3) | 50.0% (25/50) |
Female | 53.8% (7/13) | 47.1% (16/34) | 66.7% (2/3) | 50.0% (25/50) |
Outcome | | | | |
Alive | 76.9% (10/13) | 52.9% (18/34) | 66.7% (2/3) | 60.0% (30/50) |
Died | 23.1% (3/13) | 47.1% (16/34) | 33.3% (1/3) | 40.0% (20/50) |
Abnormal developmentc | | | | 74.0% (37/50) |
Developmental delay | 61.5% (8/13) | 70.6% (24/34) | 33.3% (1/3) | 66.0% (33/50) |
Developmental regression | 0 | 17.6% (6/34) | 33.3% (1/3) | 14.0% (7/50) |
Epilepsyd | | | | 68.0% (34/50) |
Generalized tonic-clonic seizures | 23.1% (3/13) | 26.5% (9/34) | 0 | 24.0% (12/50) |
Super refractory status epilepticus | 7.7% (1/13) | 17.6% (6/34) | 0 | 14.0% (7/50) |
Refractory status epilepticus | 0 | 14.7% (5/34) | 0 | 10.0% (5/50) |
Focal status epilepticus | 0 | 26.5% (9/34) | 0 | 18.0% (9/50) |
Dystonia | 38.5% (5/13) | 32.4% (11/34) | 0 | 32.0% (16/50) |
Peripheral neuropathy | 53.8% (7/13) | 2.9% (1/34) | 33.3% (1/3) | 18.0% (9/50) |
Microcephaly | 15.4% (2/13) | 20.6% (7/34) | 0 | 18.0% (9/50) |
Encephalopathy | 15.4% (2/13) | 17.6% (6/34) | 33.3% (1/3) | 18.0% (9/50) |
Ataxia | 46.2% (6/13) | 5.9% (2/34) | 0 | 16.0% (8/50) |
Pain insensitivity | 15.4% (2/13) | 11.8% (4/34) | 0 | 12.0% (6/50) |
Dysarthria | 38.5% (5/13) | 2.9% (1/34) | 0 | 12.0% (6/50) |
Strabismus | 15.4% (2/13) | 5.9% (2/34) | 33.3% (1/3) | 10.0% (5/50) |
Abnormal brain MRI | 38.5% (5/13) | 82.4% (28/34) | 33.3% (1/3) | 68.0% (34/50) |
Abnormal EEG | 15.4% (2/13) | 58.8% (20/34) | 0 | 44.0% (22/50) |
Increased lactate level | 46.2% (6/13) | 47.1% (16/34) | 0 | 42.0% (21/50) |
De novovariants (N = 53) | 72.7% (8/16) | 91.2% (31/34) | 100% (3/3) | 79.2% (42/53) |
Discussion and conclusions
In recent years, mitochondrial genes and nuclear genes related to mitochondrial structure and function have been extensively identified.
DNM1L, encoding DRP1, is a member of the dynamin superfamily of GTPases that mediates mitochondrial and peroxisomal fission [
3,
7]. Currently, mitochondrial diseases associated with
DNM1L are rarely studied. The first case of
DNM1L deficiency was reported in 2007 by Waterham et al., who described a case of infanthood-onset of mitochondrial disease with global developmental delay, microcephaly, abnormal brain development, optic atrophy, and persistent hyperlactatemia [
10]. Subsequent studies have further broadened the clinical phenotypic spectrum.
The pathogenic variant in
DNM1L is associated with a neurological disorder called “EMPF1” and has been described as a fatal encephalopathy. Affected individuals have different phenotypes ranging from severe hypotonia leading to death in the neonatal period to developmental delay/regression (DD/DR), with or without epilepsy [
18,
23,
26]. Interestingly, the
DNM1L variant in pedigrees 1, 2, and 14 exhibited a milder phenotype, familial isolated optic atrophy, and the results of functional analysis of these variants suggested a dominant negative mechanism [
15,
41]. Our patient had an onset at 1.5 years of age and presented with paroxysmal limb motor dysfunction, manifested by unilateral limb weakness, tiptoeing, and a hemiplegic gait on the affected side. This condition has not been seen in previous reports, revealing an extended phenotype of the
DNM1L variant. Interestingly, treatment with coenzyme Q
10 and Levocarnitine was effective, contrary to reported cases [
14,
19,
22,
33]. Furthermore, she was found to have strabismus and visual impairment, consistent with the phenotype of the novel variant of the
DNM1L gene identified [
15,
19], but without epilepsy throughout the developmental milestones.
Generally, pathogenic variants involving the DRP1 middle domain also appear to be more severe than those affecting the GTPase domain, which mainly manifest as visual abnormalities with or without a tendency to neurological and developmental deficits [
5,
8,
15,
24]. Variants in the GTPase domain have been reported in 29 patients, all of whom had a relatively stable course, except for two who developed respiratory failure and died soon after birth [
23]. Moreover, we found that the incidence of developmental delay/regression and epilepsy was greater in the middle domain than that in the GTPase domain, and the proportion of epileptic persistence and refractory epilepsy was similarly higher in the middle domain (Table 2). The reason may be that variants in the GTPase domain may disrupt the binding of the GTPase domain, and the presence of multiple interaction sites in the oligomers may hinder their cohesion, resulting in a relatively mild clinical phenotype [
5].
The GED plays a role in the activation of the GTPase domain. Previous studies have shown that the GED is involved in the formation and stability of DRP1 homodimeric complexes and that the corresponding GED variant in human DRP1 reduces GTPase activity and decreases intramolecular interactions between the GED and the middle domain [
8,
40,
42]. The first patient with the GED variant (p.Tyr691Cys) was found to have neonatal hypotonia that progressed to unprovoked myoclonic seizures, developmental delay, and static encephalopathy accompanied by nystagmus, optic atrophy, and scoliosis. The second case of the GED variant (p.Arg710Gly) showed similar symptoms to those of the p.Tyr691Cys variant. Interestingly, both patients with GED variants exhibited less severe phenotypes such as epilepsy, optic atrophy, and impaired mobility [
8,
40]. Here, we describe a patient with a distinct phenotype due to a novel variant in the
DNM1L gene located in the GED of the DRP1 protein. As far as we know, this is the third GED variant identified to date. The variant produces a stop-gain mutation (p.Gln721Ter) in the DRP1 protein, resulting in an early termination codon at position 721. Our patient showed no epilepsy or optic atrophy throughout the developmental milestones except for hemiplegia and strabismus, and had the mildest phenotype compared to the patients mentioned above. However, as the interactions, functional and structural roles of the GED of mammalian DRP1 remain unclear and reports of GED variants associated with human disease are lacking, the impact of this domain remains to be further explored. Additionally, based on the difference in age of onset, whether the child eventually presented with epilepsy or encephalopathy needs to be considered in follow-up.
In conclusion, we identified a novel de novo heterozygous DNM1L variant in one individual in a Chinese family. Not only did the case share similar clinical features compared with previous cases, but the newly reported manifestations, such as hemiparesis, broadened the phenotypic spectrum of the DNM1L variant. DNM1L-related diseases have heterogeneous clinical manifestations and genetic features that may affect multiple systems, but the diagnosis of this disease requires genetic testing for confirmation. Furthermore, future functional studies will be essential to confirm that the variant is truly deleterious. Our systematic description of the clinical presentation and progression of patients will help to identify other rare patients with DNM1L variants in a timely manner. Importantly, this report provides a better understanding of the impact of DNM1L variants on phenotypic outcomes, which will inform the clinical diagnosis of DNM1L-related diseases.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.